« TVs
Cello C32224
11 Images

Cello C32224 TV

RapidWarehouse-Office
3 Reviews
No Expert Reviews
2 User Reviews
Technical Review
  • 32" Screen Size
  • HD-ready HD Type
  • A Energy Efficiency Class
  • 2 Years Old
  • £49.06 Running Cost Over 5 Years - Calculate

Offers from retailers in the United Kingdom

RapidWarehouse-Office logo
£294.95
Go to Shop »
RapidWarehouse-Office logo
£311.93
Go to Shop »
- Less from RapidWarehouse-Office
Office Monster Online logo
£320.51
Go to Shop »
Office Monster Online logo
£339.17
Go to Shop »
- Less from Office Monster Online
9to5supplies logo
£324.89
Go to Shop »
- Less from 9to5supplies
Improve this page
6 Reasons For

Running Costs Are Very Low

This LED screen has an efficiency rating of A. The average 5 year running cost of the C32224 is only £53 based on typical energy prices, which is in the cheapest 4% of all 329 mid-size TVs that were launched more than a year ago.


Calculate your own running costs for the Cello C32224.

Edit

No. of TVs
0
300
600
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
A+
A++
A+++
Energy Efficiency Class

5000:1 Typical Contrast Ratio

The Cello C32224 has a maximum typical contrast ratio of 5000:1. That's over four times the typical contrast ratio of the most frequently found typical contrast ratio of 1200:1.

This LED screen's typical contrast ratio (5000:1) is in fact the best typical contrast ratio amongst all mid-size TVs that are more than a year old.

The worst typical contrast ratio amongst similar types of LED screen is 1100:1.

It is worth also looking at other LED screens that have a 5000:1 typical contrast ratio including the 40L3451 (£289.99), or the 40L3453 (£269.99) both from Toshiba or the Cello C39226 (£249.00) which have a better Kagoo Rating™.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Supports Two Analog Signal Format Systems

The number of analog signal format systems supported by the Cello C32224 is more than most LED televisions of a similar age and spec to it. The most frequently supported analog signal format system is NTSC, but this analog signal format system is not supported by this TV. The analog signal format systems PAL and SECAM are also supported by this LED screen.

Chart Edit

Supports Three TV Bands

The Cello C32224 has a greater number of TV bands than most one year old TVs. This LED screen supports a VHF TV band, which is the most commonly supported TV band supported by mid-size TVs that have been available for around the same time as the C32224. The TV bands "CATV" and "UHF" are also supported by this LED display.

Chart Edit

Has One Screen Format Adjustment

The Cello C32224 has a greater number of screen format adjustments than most mid-size TVs that have been on the market for more than a year. This LED television has a 16:9 screen format adjustment, which is the most commonly found screen format adjustment found on LED screens of a similar age and spec to the C32224.

Chart Edit

A Bit Narrow

The average width of mid-size TVs that have been available for a comparable time to the C32224 is 920mm. With a width of only 738 millimeters, the Cello C32224 is one of the narrower TVs that came out around the same time as the C32224 amongst mid-size TVs of this age.

Read more Less Chart Edit

7 Reasons Against

Very Small Screen Size

Across all the mid-size TVs that came out around the same time as the C32224 the screen sizes range from 31" to 50". The Cello C32224 has a fairly small screen size (only 32 inches) compared to most of the other mid-size TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as the C32224.

We compared this TV to all the other 32" TVs and we think the Toshiba 32L1343 (£239.13) which are cheaper; or the Sony KDL-32W654 (£349.99), and the Samsung UE32F4510 (£299.99) which have a better Kagoo Rating™ are also worth considering.

If you are looking for a TV with a larger screen size then you might want to consider the Cello C39226 (£249.00) (39" and higher rated), or the Panasonic TX-39ASW504 (£367.85) (39" and higher rated).

Read more Less Edit

No. of TVs
0
215
430
32"
10"
19"
26"
32"
39"
46"
52"
59"
65"
72"
98"
Worst
Best
Screen Size

Does Not Have a WiFi Connection

The Cello C32224 does not have a WiFi connection, unlike most of the other TVs of a similar age and type to the C32224 which have a WiFi connection.

It is worth considering other TVs with a WiFi connection including the Toshiba 40L5453 (£299.00), the LG 42LB630 (£299.00), or the Sharp LC-42LE761 (£299.00).

Read more Less Edit

Not Smart TV

The Cello C32224 is not Smart TV, although this is within the context that most of the other mid-size TVs that were released around the same time as the C32224 are also not Smart TV.

Edit

Not 3D Compatible

The Cello C32224 is not 3D compatible, although this is within the context that most of the other comparable spec LED displays that were launched more than a year ago are also not 3D compatible.

If you would prefer an LED television that is 3D compatible then you might want to also look at the Toshiba 40L5453 (£299.00), the Sharp LC-42LE761 (£299.00), or the Philips 42PFT6309 (£337.94).

Read more Less Edit

Does Not Have a Built-in Camera

Most of the similar spec LED screens that came out around the same time as the C32224, including the Cello C32224, do not have a built-in camera.

Edit

Very Dim Display Brightness

The Cello C32224 has a quite dim display brightness (only 250 candellas per square meter) compared to most of the other TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as the C32224. Across all the one year old similar spec LED screens the display brightnesses range from 220 cd/m² to 3,000 cd/m², and the average display brightness is 330 cd/m².

Chart Edit

Thick Thickness

The thinnest thickness of comparable spec TVs that have been on the market for more than a year is 3.5mm and the thickest is 190mm. With a thickness of 90 millimeters, the Cello C32224 has one of the thicker thicknesses amongst mid-size TVs of this age.

Read more Less Chart Edit

4 Other Reasons to Consider the Cello C32224

Cello Has OK LED Screen Reviews

Cello has ok ratings for its mid-size TVs as well as for all TVs.

Chart

Over Two Years Old

Cello released the C32224 over two years ago.

HD-Ready HD Type

HD-Ready HD Type

The Cello C32224 has a maximum display resolution of HD-Ready. That's 56% less display resolution than the most frequently found HD type of Full HD. HD-ready TVs have a resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels.

We compared this LED display to all the other HD-ready LED screens and we think the Sharp LC-32LD166 (£253.50), and the Sony KDL-32R410 (£243.96) which have a better Kagoo Rating™; or the Haier LE32B7000 (£224.30) which are cheaper are also worth considering.

If the display resolution of this LED television is too low for you then you might want to consider the Panasonic TX-42AS500 (£304.99) (Full HD and higher rated), or the LG 42LB5500 (£239.00) (Full HD and higher rated).

Read more Less Edit

No. of TVs
0
500
1000
HD-Ready
Full HD
2K Ultra HD
4K Ultra HD
HD Type

Average Refresh Rate

At 60 hertz, the Cello C32224 has a relatively standard refresh rate compared to most of the other one year old mid-size TVs.

If this Cello LED display refresh rate is not fast enough for you then you might want to also look at the TX-39A400 (£239.00) (100Hz and higher rated), or the TX-32AS500 (£279.99) (100Hz and higher rated) both from Panasonic.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Cello C32224 TV Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers 1080, 1080p
Barcodes 05052184042166, 05060062264579, 05060062264647, 05060062264784, 05060062265040, 05060062265187

Similar TVs Worth Considering

Full HD & Newer by Eight Months
Full HD
Higher Display Resolution
One More USB 2.0 Port
Energy Efficiency Rating is Superior
Newer by Eight Months
£4 More Expensive
Only 3000:1 Typical Contrast Ratio
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by £27.97
Full HD & Newer by Seven Months
Full HD
Higher Display Resolution
Energy Efficiency Rating is Superior
Newer by Seven Months
Larger Screen Size
£23 More Expensive
Lower RMS Rated Power
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by £31.43
Only Two HDMI Ports
192mm Wider
Higher Display Resolution & Newer by Eight Months
£25 Cheaper
Higher Display Resolution
Twice the Display Resolution
One More USB 2.0 Port
Energy Efficiency Rating is Better
Lower RMS Rated Power
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by £28.46
19% Wider
Taller
Does Not Have a PC in Port
Full HD & Larger Screen Size
Full HD
Higher Display Resolution
Energy Efficiency Rating is Superior
40Hz Faster Refresh Rate
20% Thinner
£30 More Expensive
£50.99 More Expensive to Run Over Five Years
Only Two HDMI Ports
34% Lower RMS Rated Power
155.4mm Wider
Twice the Display Resolution & 18% Larger Screen Size
£33 Cheaper
Twice the Display Resolution
1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution
Faster Refresh Rate
Higher Energy Efficiency Rating
140% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
Half As Good Tuner
412mm Taller
30 Cd/m² Dimmer Display Brightness
Does Not Have a Common Interface Connection
Twice the Display Resolution & Newer by Nine Months
£46 Cheaper
Twice the Display Resolution
1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution
Energy Efficiency Rating is Higher
Newer by Nine Months
£54.32 More Expensive to Run Over Five Years
Wider
10% Taller
Thicker